Search End of Cyberspace

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Recent Comments

Blog powered by TypePad

Contacting

  • Click to leave me a voice message using Grand Central.

    Skype Me™!

    Contact me via Skype.

LinkedIn


3 posts categorized "Current Affairs"

Martin Libicki and the conquest of cyberspace

A decade ago, Martin Libicki wrote Defending Cyberspace, and Other Metaphors. Among other things, two essays examine the utility of the metaphor of "cyberspace" in military thinking:

"Deterring Information Attacks," continues the examination of the metaphor that information warfare is indeed warfare by discussing the problems of retaliation and asking whether an explicit policy of retaliation is workable and thus likely to deter....

The last essay, "Point, Counterpoint, and Counter-counterpoint," was inspired by a search for a new metaphor for new kinds of warfare. Conflict has classically been modeled by orthogonal lines of defense and attack. Today's asymmetric warfare is about points, blots, and gated fences, topological forms with particular applicability to information warfare.

Tonight I see that Libicki's latest book, Conquest in Cyberspace: National Security and Information Warfare, is coming out this year. From the Cambridge Press catalog description:

With billions of computers in existence, cyberspace, 'the virtual world created when they are connected,' is said to be the new medium of power. Computer hackers operating from anywhere can enter cyberspace and take control of other people's computers, stealing their information, corrupting their workings, and shutting them down. Modern societies and militaries, both pervaded by computers, are supposedly at risk. As Conquest in Cyberspace explains, however, information systems and information itself are too easily conflated, and persistent mastery over the former is difficult to achieve.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Defending cyberspace

My second post on this blog was about the new Air Force mission statement, which included a mention of the defense of cyberspace. Now, Wired News reports that

The U.S. Air Force plans to set up what could become a major command aimed at safeguarding U.S. military and civilian cyberspace, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne said on Thursday....

Wynne said the new command would be part of the 8th Air Force based at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, a unit made famous during the combined armored offensive in Europe during World War II.

The mission of bombers now within the 8th Air Force would remain, and the new cyber-command reflects the Air Force's growing reliance on computer networks, data and electronic warfare.

Wynne said he hoped the new command would eventually be on par with such major Air Force units as the Space Command and the Air Combat Command. In creating what could become a unit led by a four-star Air Force general, the Air Force would set the stage for significant budget resources and congressional interest.

Clearly, even in a period when other meanings of cyberspace are eroding, the concept of cyberspace as a space in which Bad Guys have to be confronted and defeated is still very much alive in some circles.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

So much for the end of cyberspace?

Well, I guess I can give up the whole end of cyberspace argument. The Air Force's new mission statement was recently announced to great fanfare:



The mission of the United States Air Force is to deliver sovereign options for the defense of the United States of America and its global interests -- to fly and fight in Air, Space, and Cyberspace.

Of course, there's no question that electronic warfare-- ranging from attacks on control systems to theft of sensitive information-- is a growing problem. But what strikes me about this mission statement is that it implicitly treats cyberspace as a place-- as a theatre of operations equal to air or space. The desire to localize the threat-- or turn the threat into one that exists somewhere separate from the real world-- is interesting.

More generally, perhaps military thinking about warfare in cyberspace would be worth looking at for this project. The have been several hundred articles on cyberwarfare, and a 2001 book by Gregory Rattray titled Strategic Warfare in Cyberspace, on "strategic information warfare waged via digital means."

And maybe it's just me, but wouldn't "sovereign options" be an excellent name for a band, or perhaps a high-end line of men's accessories?

[To the tune of Marvin Gaye, "God is love," from the album "What's going on". Wasn't Marvin a genius?]

Technorati Tags: ,

What is the End of Cyberspace?

  • About the end of cyberspace

    Cyberspace is a "metaphor we live by," born two decades ago at the intersection of computers, networks, ideas, and experience. It has reflected our experiences with information technology, and also shaped the way we think about new technologies and the challenges they present. It had been a vivid and useful metaphor for decades; but in a rapidly-emerging world of mobile, always-on information devices (and eventually cybernetic implants, prosthetics, and swarm intelligence), the rules that define the relationship between information, places, and daily life are going to be rewritten. As the Internet becomes more pervasive-- as it moves off desktops and screen and becomes embedded in things, spaces, and minds-- cyberspace will disappear.

  • About this blog

    This blog is about what happens next. It's about the end of cyberspace, but more important, about what new possibilities will emerge as new technologies, interfaces, use practices, games, legal theory, regulation, and culture adjust-- and eventually dissolve-- the boundaries between the virtual and physical worlds.

  • About the author

    Alex Soojung-Kim Pang is an historian of science and futurist.

    ping Pang

My del.icio.us


Technorati cyberspace

Innovation Hub